Thursday, March 11, 2010

Triangle Breastfeeding Alliance, Inc.

Start Healthy Stay Healthy

A Chemical That Shouldn’t Be In Breast Milk

Posted by NCTBA.org On February - 26 - 2010 1 COMMENT

Source: http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/02/26/358315/a-chemical-that-shouldnt-be-in.html

BY KRISTIE MATHER AND JESSICA NAKELL BURROUGHS
Tags: news | opinion – editorial | point of view

DURHAM — Last week, a friend e-mailed us a disturbing new scientific study titled “Younger mothers’ breast milk has highest levels of flame retardants.” According to researchers at the UNC School of Public Health, nearly three-quarters of 300 North Carolina mothers studied had some amount of toxic flame-retardants, known as polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), in their breast milk.

PBDEs are common flame-retardants used to slow the spread of fires. They are used in household products such as computers, televisions, mattresses and textiles. These chemicals, which have been shown to be toxic to the brain and hormone system (and also have safer, nontoxic alternatives), end up in our bodies.

In addition to the load that any child accumulates through his own exposure, finding PBDEs in breast milk means that breast-fed infants will receive an additional dose of this brain toxin. Babies and children are at greater risk from chemicals that affect their developing bodies than are adults, making this all the more alarming.

We both breast-fed our sons, feeling confident that breast milk is always the “best milk” for babies. However, it is maddening to know that along with all the wonderful benefits we were delivering to our babies – antibodies, healthy fats and immune-system boosts – we were also serving up a dose of toxic chemicals.

Pregnant and lactating women are strongly urged to eat a healthful diet, exercise, avoid cigarette smoke, decrease stress and generally adopt habits to ensure that their infants have the best possible prenatal environment. But no one told us to avoid environmental toxins, and even if they did, with these chemicals pervasive in our world, there is very little that we could have done.

How could our country have let this happen?

The problem goes back more than 30 years. In 1976, President Gerald Ford signed the Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA was intended to protect us from toxic chemicals but has proven to be dangerously ineffective. The law grandfathered in all 60,000 chemicals used in consumer products at the time. The result is that chemicals used in consumer products are virtually unregulated. This is surely a system that takes too many risks with our children’s health.

What can we do? We need to update TSCA to ensure that chemicals are proven safe before they end up in consumer products and ultimately our bodies. Congress is expected to take up a bill that does just that, and North Carolina Reps. G.K. Butterfield and Sue Myrick are members of House committees that will be front and center in the process.

We look forward to working with them to ensure that the bill requires manufacturers to provide basic health and safety information on chemicals before they enter the marketplace and that we take immediate action on chemicals like PBDEs, which persist in our bodies and environment.

We will continue to be confident that we made the right choice to breast-feed our children because the multitude of health and emotional benefits outweigh the PBDE risks. But we think all children should be able to derive those benefits without also paying the price of higher PBDE exposure.

We will continue to ensure that mothers and children have a strong voice as the debate to reform TSCA takes shape in Congress. Our elected representatives should do everything they can to get toxic chemicals out of our bodies so that mothers do not have to stop and question whether breastfeeding might harm our children. It is time that we move away from the “chemical of the day” headlines and move toward a system that truly ensures that a mother’s milk is free of toxic chemicals.

Kristie Mather and Jessica Nakell Burroughs are with Triangle Moms Rising, a founding member of the Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families coalition (www.saferchemicals.org).

Let’s Move-Michelle Obama’s Initiative

Posted by NCTBA.org On February - 20 - 2010 ADD COMMENTS

Michelle Obama has a new initiative about preventing obesity and she believes as we do that it begins with breastfeeding.  This is great to her as an advocate in our favor.

BF Let’s move Michelle Obama Initative-1

The Risks of Not Breastfeeding for Mothers and Infants

Posted by NCTBA.org On February - 18 - 2010 ADD COMMENTS

Alison Stuebe, MD, MSc

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

“Health outcomes in developed countries differ substantially for mothers and infants who formula feed compared with those who breastfeed. For infants, not being breastfed is associated with an increased incidence of infectious morbidity, as well as elevated risks of childhood obesity, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, leukemia, and sudden infant death syndrome. For mothers, failure to breastfeed is associated with an increased incidence of premenopausal breast cancer, ovarian cancer, retained gestational weight gain, type 2 diabetes, myocardial infarction, and the metabolic syndrome. Obstetricians are uniquely positioned to counsel mothers about the health impact of breastfeeding and to ensure that mothers and infants receive appropriate, evidence-based care, starting at birth.”
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2(4):222-231 doi: 10.3909/riog0093]

Click here for rest of article

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)

Transmission of Yellow Fever Vaccine Virus Through Breast-Feeding

Brazil, 2009
Weekly
February 12, 2010 / 59(05);130-132

In April, 2009, the state health department of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, was notified by the Cachoeira do Sul municipal health department of a case of meningoencephalitis requiring hospitalization in an infant whose mother recently had received yellow fever vaccine during a postpartum visit. The Field Epidemiology Training Program of the Secretariat of Surveillance in Health of the Brazilian Ministry of Health assisted state and municipal health departments with an investigation. This report summarizes the results of that investigation, which determined that the infant acquired yellow fever vaccine virus through breast-feeding. The mother reported 2 days of headache, malaise, and low fever occurring 5 days after receipt of yellow fever vaccine. The infant, who was exclusively breast-fed, was hospitalized at age 23 days with seizures requiring continuous infusion of
intravenous anticonvulsants. The infant received antimicrobial and antiviral treatment for meningoencephalitis. The presence of 17DD yellow fever virus was detected by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the infant’s cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); yellow fever–specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies also were present in
serum and CSF. The infant recovered completely, was discharged after 24 days of hospitalization, and has had normal neurodevelopment and growth through age 6 months. The findings in this report provide documentation that yellow fever vaccine virus can be transmitted via breast-feeding.  Administration of yellow fever vaccine to breast-feeding women should be avoided except in situations where exposure to yellow fever viruses cannot be avoided or postponed.

On March 23, the mother, aged 22 years, delivered a healthy female infant at 39 weeks’ gestational age by elective cesarean delivery. During that same month, a yellow fever epidemic had spread to a nonendemic area in Rio Grande do Sul state where the mother resided (1). On April 7, when the mother was 15 days postpartum, she visited her health-care provider to have the sutures removed from her caesarean incision. While in the provider’s office, she received 17DD yellow fever vaccine. She had not been vaccinated
for yellow fever previously. On April 12, 5 days after receiving the vaccine, she reported a headache, malaise, and low fever, which persisted for 2 days. The mother did not seek medical care for her symptoms.

On April 15, 2009, the mother’s infant, aged 23 days, developed fever, and irritability and refused to nurse. The next day, the infant exhibited seizure-like activity and was admitted to the hospital for evaluation of possible meningoencephalitis. Upon admission, the infant experienced unilateral left upper extremity clonic convulsions of increasing frequency
requiring intravenous diazepam (0.15 mg). Perioral cyanosis was noted and oxygen saturation measured by arterial blood gas was pO2 60 (normal: pO2 80–100). A chest radiograph showed no infiltrate. Peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count was 25,400/mm3 (normal: 5,000–20,000 WBC/mm3) and platelet count was 393,000/mm3 (normal: =150,000 platelets/mm3). Laboratory examination of CSF was unremarkable, with a WBC count of 1/mm3 (normal: 0–5 WBC/mm3), slight elevation of protein (67 mg/dL [normal: 15—45 mg/dL]), and decreased glucose concentration (37 mg/dL [normal: 42—78 mg/dL]). Gram stain of the CSF specimen revealed no bacteria. The infant received oxygen therapy, intravenous dipyrone (0.1 mL every 6 hours) and phenytoin (10 mg every 12 hours), and empiric treatment for bacterial infection with ampicillin and gentamicin. On April 18, empiric acyclovir treatment was added. No specimens for bacterial or fungal cultures were obtained. Other etiologies for meningoencephalitis were ruled out by testing of serum and CSF samples for dengue-specific IgM; viral culture for herpes simplex, cytomegalovirus, and varicella; and RT-PCR for enteroviruses, all of which were negative.

The infant alternated between periods of somnolence and irritability, without clinical improvement. On April 19, convulsions became more frequent (one episode every 10 minutes) and difficult to control, with persistent perioral cyanosis, resulting in transfer to the pediatric ICU for continuous infusion of anticonvulsants and monitoring of oxygen saturation. A second CSF examination showed a WBC count of 128/mm3, a protein concentration of 106 mg/dL, and a glucose concentration of 24 mg/dL. Computerized tomography of the head demonstrated bilateral symmetrical areas of diffuse low density suggestive of inflammation consistent with encephalitis.

After the second CSF examination on April 19, the mother mentioned receiving yellow fever vaccine 8 days before the infant’s onset of symptoms, and a serum and CSF sample from the infant were sent to the arbovirus reference laboratory at Adolfo Lutz Institute in São Paulo, Brazil, to test for the presence of 17DD yellow fever vaccine virus. Yellow
fever-specific IgM antibodies were detected in serum and CSF. Yellow fever viral RNA was amplified by RT-PCR (2,3) from a CSF specimen collected on April 19; the nucleotide sequence of the amplified PCR product was identical to 17DD yellow fever vaccine virus. No breast milk or maternal serum was collected for yellow fever virus testing.

The infant recovered completely and was discharged from the hospital without sequelae on May 10, 2009. Follow-up of the infant showed normal neurodevelopment and growth through age 6 months. The Brazilian Committee on Vaccine-Associated Adverse Events classified the child’s encephalitis as yellow fever vaccine–associated neurologic disease. To rule out the possibility that the infant had received yellow fever vaccine inadvertently, the investigators reviewed all procedures documented in the medical record performed between the infant’s birth and onset of symptoms. The child had received intramuscular vitamin K and hepatitis B vaccine on the day of birth. Two other children born on the same day had received hepatitis B vaccine from the same lot of vaccine as the one registered in the child’s vaccination record, and neither experienced similar symptoms.

Reported by
A Mallmann Couto, MD, M Ribeiro Salomão, MD, Hospital de Caridade de Cachoeira do Sul; MT Schermann, MD, R Mohrdieck, MD, Rio Grande do Sul State Health Dept, Porto Alegre; A Suzuki, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo; SM Deotti Carvalho, National Immunization Program, Secretariat of Surveillance in Health (SVS), Ministry of Health (MoH), Brasilia; DM de Assis, Brazilian Field Epidemiology Training Program (EPISUS) and Vector-borne Diseases and Anthropozoonoses Surveillance, SVS, MoH, Brasilia; W Navegantes Araújo, DVM, EPISUS, SVS, MoH, Brasilia, and Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, MoH, Salvador; B Flannery, PhD, Pan American Health Organization, Brasilia, Brazil.

Editorial Note

This report describes the first laboratory-confirmed case of yellow fever vaccine–associated neurologic disease occurring in an infant secondary to the transmission of yellow fever vaccine virus through breast milk. The infant described in this report also is the youngest reported case of yellow fever vaccine–associated neurologic disease. The presence of yellow fever-specific IgM in CSF, and 17DD yellow fever vaccine viral RNA in the CSF of the infant indicates transmission and infection with yellow fever vaccine. Following primary vaccination, IgM antibodies generally appear 4–7 days after receipt of vaccine (4). Maternal IgM antibodies can be excreted in breast milk and the presence of serum IgM in the infant alone is not diagnostic of yellow fever virus infection. The detection of IgM antibodies in the infant’s CSF indicates intrathecal antibody production in response to a nervous system infection because IgM does not normally cross the blood brain barrier (5).

Based on the mother’s receipt of yellow fever vaccine on April 7, and onset of symptoms in the infant on April 15, the infant’s infection likely occurred during the expected peak of viremia following vaccination. Neurologic adverse events, including encephalitis, have been described previously in association with yellow fever vaccination; children aged <6
months have the highest incidence of vaccine-associated neurologic events (6). However, only one previous episode of encephalitis, which was not confirmed as vaccine-associated, has been described in an infant exposed to yellow fever vaccine virus through breast-feeding (Public Health Agency of Canada, personal communications, 2009).

Yellow fever vaccine is a live, attenuated virus preparation made from various strains of the 17D yellow fever virus lineage. In Brazil, yellow fever vaccine from the 17DD strain is produced by Bio-Manguinhos, a public sector vaccine manufacturer of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Yellow fever vaccine–associated neurologic disease (YEL-AND, formerly known as postvaccinal encephalitis) is reported to occur at a rate of 0.4 cases per 100,000 persons vaccinated in the U.S. population, with highest rates reported among persons aged =60 years (1.6 per 100,000) (6). However, the incidence among infants aged <6 months has been estimated as 0.5–4.0 cases per 1,000 infants vaccinated (4). For this reason, administration of 17D-derived yellow fever vaccines is contraindicated in infants aged <6 months (4,7,8).

Yellow fever virus, either wild-type or 17D, has not been reported to have been isolated from or detected in human breast milk. West Nile virus (WNV), another flavivirus, has been detected in milk from WNV-infected, lactating women (9), and one case of probable WNV transmission through breast-feeding has been reported (10). The actual risk for 17DD virus transmission through breast-feeding cannot be characterized because the number of breast-feeding women who have been vaccinated without negative sequelae in their infants is unknown. Based on the theoretical risk for yellow fever vaccine virus transmission through breast milk, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that yellow fever vaccination of nursing mothers be avoided, except when travel of nursing mothers to high-risk yellow fever–endemic areas cannot be avoided or postponed (7). Vaccine recommendations from the World Health Organization do not include considerations for breast-feeding mothers (8).

In Brazil, yellow fever vaccination is recommended for all residents of municipalities considered at risk for yellow fever transmission, and for travelers to at-risk areas (1). As a result of this investigation, the Brazilian Ministry of Health is revising its recommendations to caution against administration of yellow fever vaccine to breast-feeding women, except in situations where the risk for contracting yellow fever is unavoidable. Further studies on excretion of 17DD virus in breast milk of vaccinated, lactating women would help to define a risk period for viral transmission in cases where vaccination of nursing mothers is necessary.

Acknowledgments

The findings in this report are based, in part, on contributions from M Dallagnol, Municipal Dept of Health and Environment, Cachoeira do Sul; M Corrêa Lenz, M Assunta Bercini, MD, Rio Grande do Sul State Health Dept, Porto Alegre; R de Cássia Compagnoli Carmona, S Pires Curti, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo; and C Guedes Ramos, G Lima Nascimento, and MA Nunes Medeiros, Brazilian Field Epidemiology Training Program, Brasilia, Brazil.

References
1. Brazilian Ministry of Health. Emergências em Saúde Pública de Importância Nacional (ESPIN) de Febre Amarela Silvestre em São Paulo e no Rio Grande do Sul e a Situação Epidemiológica Atual no Brasil (2008/2009). [Portuguese] Available at
http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/arquivos/pdf/boletim_febre_amarela_09_12_09.pdf

Embedded image moved to file: pic27595.gif)Adobe PDF fileExternal Web Site Icon. Accessed February 9, 2010.
2. dos Santos CN, Post PR, Carvalho R, Ferreira, II, Rice CM, Galler R.
Complete nucleotide sequence of yellow fever virus vaccine strains
17DD and 17D-213. Virus Res 1995;35:35–41.
3. Wang E, Weaver SC, Shope RE, Tesh RB, Watts DM, Barrett AD. Genetic variation in yellow fever virus: duplication in the 3′ noncoding region of strains from Africa. Virology 1996;225:274–81.
4. Monath TP, Centron MS, Teuwen DE. Yellow fever vaccine. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, eds. Vaccines. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2008.
5. McMahon AW, Eidex RB, Marfin AA, et al. Neurologic disease associated with 17D-204 yellow fever vaccination: a report of 15 cases. Vaccine 2007;25:1727–34.
6. Khromava AY, Eidex RB, Weld LH, et al. Yellow fever vaccine: an updated assessment of advanced age as a risk factor for serious adverse events. Vaccine 2005;23:3256–63.
7. CDC. Yellow fever vaccine; recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 2002;51(No. RR-17).
8. World Health Organization. Yellow fever vaccine: WHO position paper.
Wkly Epidem Rec 2003;78:349–59.
9. Hinckley AF, O’Leary DR, Hayes EB. Transmission of West Nile virus through human breast milk seems to be rare. Pediatrics 2007;119:e666–71.
10. CDC. Possible West Nile virus transmission to an infant through breast-feeding—Michigan, 2002. MMWR 2002;51:877–8.

Preventing Obesity Begins at Birth through Breastfeeding

Posted by NCTBA.org On February - 11 - 2010 ADD COMMENTS

February 11, 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT
Megan Renner
301-807-4963 (cell)
mrenner@usbreastfeeding.org

Preventing Obesity Begins at Birth through Breastfeeding

Washington, DC–As First Lady Michelle Obama launches her campaign to fight childhood obesity, the United States Breastfeeding Committee (USBC) reminds the public, health care professionals, and educators that obesity prevention begins at the earliest moments of life when parents make infant feeding decisions. Breastfeeding has been shown to have an impact on obesity throughout the life span, while also contributing to numerous other positive health outcomes.

USBC supports the “Let’s Move” campaign as a vitally important initiative for our Nation’s health, and shares the First Lady’s commitment to the goal of combining efforts to overcome obesity within a generation. In addition to the important measures outlined to reduce and prevent obesity, USBC calls on the First Lady and policymakers to consider the importance of breastfeeding and recommends that breastfeeding experts be included on the Task Force on Childhood Obesity.

As with breastfeeding, the actions necessary to reduce and prevent childhood obesity require that parents are supported to make healthy choices in all aspects of their lives. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Immunization Survey, nearly 75% of new mothers initiate breastfeeding, however, rates of exclusive breastfeeding at six months and continued breastfeeding at 12 months are well below the national Healthy People 2010 goals. Another recent CDC study found that 60% of women do not even meet their own breastfeeding goals. Thus USBC applauds and echoes the “Let’s Move” campaign’s emphasis on empowering consumers and providing parents with the tools, support and information they need to make healthier choices for their families, beginning with breastfeeding.

According to USBC Chair, Joan Younger Meek, MD, MS, RD, IBCLC, “Multiple studies have shown that a history of not breastfeeding increases the risk of being overweight or obese in childhood and adolescence. Adolescent obesity often persists into adult life. Breastfeeding plays an important role in obesity prevention and improving overall health outcomes, and therefore is vitally important to public health.”

Dr. Meek points out that the longer and the more exclusively babies breastfeed, the better their health outcomes. “Both duration and exclusivity should be considered when investigating the relationships between breastfeeding and obesity. The duration of breastfeeding has been shown to be inversely related to overweight–meaning that the longer the duration of breastfeeding, the lower the odds of overweight. And although further research is needed, exclusive breastfeeding appears to have a stronger protective effect than breastfeeding combined with formula feeding.”

The evidence for the value of breastfeeding to children’s and women’s health is scientific, solid, and continually being reaffirmed by new research. Medical experts agree with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in recommending exclusive breastfeeding for six months and continued breastfeeding for the first year of life and beyond. The comprehensive review and analysis of breastfeeding research released in 2007 by the DHHS Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality strongly supports the evidence demonstrated in the research:

  • For the child: reduced risk of ear, skin, stomach, and respiratory infections, diarrhea, sudden infant death syndrome, and necrotizing enterocolitis; and in the longer term, reduced risk of obesity, type 1 and 2 diabetes, asthma, and childhood leukemia.
  • For the mother: reduced risk of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, type 2 diabetes, and postpartum depression.

Obesity has serious implications for the health of Americans, increasing the risk of many diseases and conditions, including: coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, certain types of cancers, high blood pressure, stroke, liver and gallbladder disease, sleep apnea and respiratory problems, osteoarthritis, and gynecological problems. USBC urges all Americans to support the “Let’s Move” campaign and to begin a healthy lifestyle at birth and prevent obesity through optimal breastfeeding of our Nation’s children.

For more information about breastfeeding, visit The National Women’s Health Information Center. Physicians and other health care providers can offer assistance and answer questions about breastfeeding, and knowledgeable breastfeeding support personnel can be located through the International Lactation Consultant Association, the USDA Food and Nutrition Service Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program, and La Leche League International.

USBC is an organization of organizations. Opinions expressed by USBC are not necessarily the position of all member organizations and opinions expressed by USBC member organization representatives are not necessarily the position of USBC.

United States Breastfeeding Committee (USBC)
The United States Breastfeeding Committee (USBC) is an independent nonprofit coalition of 41 nationally influential professional, educational, and governmental organizations. Representing over half a million concerned professionals and the families they serve, USBC and its member organizations share a common mission to improve the Nation’s health by working collaboratively to protect, promote, and support breastfeeding. For more information about USBC, visit www.usbreastfeeding.org.

Dear Friend,

I am hoping that you read this posting, and share it widely among your contacts – mothers and birthing / breastfeeding professionals alike.

Childhood sexual abuse is a very common experience among American women, which is known to have significant consequences throughout the lifespan.  The lack of public health analysis of child sexual abuse means that we have major limitations as to how we can work to prevent this type of problem, and how we can help survivors when it occurs.  Childhood sexual abuse can impact women’s experiences of breastfeeding, but there is very little information about how.  By sharing their stories, women can teach public health professionals about what the problems are, and how they can respond.

To this end, I have created a survey where women are able to share their experiences.  By clicking HERE, you can learn more about the survey, and complete the survey.  It’s pretty open-ended so that people can take as much space as they need to write about their experiences with breastfeeding, and how they may have been impacted by childhood sexual abuse.  The stories will be shared, with no identifying information, at the Breastfeeding & Feminism Symposium, as well as being part of an exciting new book due out Fall 2010.  Since there is a time crunch, please complete the survey by Friday, February 26.

There are no more than minimal risks of harm for participation, and the potential benefits to society are boundless.  (Participants won’t be asked for any identifiers like name, phone number, city, etc.)  NOTE: All participants must be 18 years of age or older.  The study is approved by the UNC-CH IRB, so if you have any concerns, call them at 919.966.3113.  If you have questions for me, call me at 919.843.4118.

Again, to share your story, click HERE.

My best,

Emily C. Taylor,  MPH, CD(DONA), Project Manager

with Miriam H. Labbok, MD, MPH, Principal Investigator

<<< AGAIN: THE LINK FOR THE SURVEY IS: http://uncodum.qualtrics.com/SE?SID=SV_eXQdDevYooF8Ya8&SVID=Prod >>>

--
Emily C. Taylor, MPH, CD(DONA)
Senior Programs Director
Carolina Breastfeeding Institute
Department of Maternal and Child Health
UNC-CH Gillings School of Global Public Health
T:  919.843.4118
F:  919.966.0458
E:  emilytaylor@unc.edu
W:  sph.unc.edu/breastfeeding

FOR HAITI ORPHANS WET NURSING CAN SAVE LIVES

Posted by NCTBA.org On February - 3 - 2010 ADD COMMENTS

A new statement issued jointly by UNICEF, the World Health Organization, and Pan American Health Organization, reminds relief workers, healthcare professionals, and the public that in an emergency such as the Haiti earthquake, the key to survival of all infants, including orphans, is breastfeeding. When a child is motherless or separated from his or her mother, wet nursing, that is, direct breastfeeding from another lactating mother, is the safest feeding option. Since the breastfeeding rate in Haiti is very high, there is a good likelihood of being able to find wet nurses for large numbers of motherless infants.

UNICEF, WHO and PAHO have recommended wet nursing, also called “cross nursing” or “shared breastfeeding,” for infants without mothers to “ensure their survival in an emergency situation.” http://oneresponse.info/Disasters/Haiti/Nutrition/publicdocuments/Forms/DispForm.aspx?ID=78

There are a very small number of pathogens that may be transmitted via breastfeeding, including HIV. However, the risk of transmission of HIV via breastfeeding is low. The alternative to wet nursing for motherless infants is use of infant formula. The situation is Haiti is such that formula feeding presents a greater risk than the possibility of HIV infection via wet nursing.

Formula feeding in an emergency is extremely difficult and dangerous. Even when properly prepared, infant formula actively and passively harms the immune system of young babies, placing them at risk of life-threatening diarrhea and respiratory illness.  [The Emergency Nutrition Network provides information on how formula can cause deaths due to diarrhea in an emergency at:  http://www.ennonline.net/resources/101.

Formula feeding also requires extensive investment from the supporting aid agency. This includes a constant supply of infant formula; a stable supply of clean water; a stove and fuel to boil water; a pot, kettle, and feeding cups.  Bottles and teats (artificial nipples) should never be used in emergency conditions because they are too difficult to adequately clean. Caregivers also need a clean storage environment, education on minimizing the risks of formula feeding, and medical supervision. This support should be provided not just in the immediate emergency, but until the infant is 12 months old.

According to the International Lactation Consultant Association (ILCA), wet nursing is not new, and has been practiced since the beginning of time not just in emergencies, but for convenience of mothers.  The practice was made more visible with reports of actress Salma Hayek, who breastfed a suffering child in Sierra Leone last year, and Chinese police officer Jiang Xiaojuan, who was reported to have breastfed five additional infants besides her own after the May 2008 earthquake in China.

ILCA provides additional recommendations on supporting breastfeeding mothers consistent with directives from international relief organizations, including:

  • Feed the mother so she can, in turn, feed her infant.
  • Provide a safe environment for breastfeeding if needed, including providing a private area or a way to breastfeed discreetly, if the mother desires it.
  • Assist mothers who are separated from their infants with regular milk removal to avoid engorgement and maintain their milk production for when they are reunited with their baby.
  • Assist mothers with re-establishing their milk production if they have already weaned their baby.

ILCA also strongly encourages the general public to avoid the temptation to donate infant formula to Haiti and, instead, to donate funds to relief organizations for use in meeting highest priority needs. Aid agencies supporting infants in Haiti that cannot be breastfed have procured the supplies that they need. Donations of infant formula only complicate the secure and sanitary provision of aid by workers on the ground.  The organizations providing aid to breastfed and formula-fed infants in Haiti include: UNICEF, Save the Children, Action Against Hunger and World Vision.

ILCA has several free downloadable resources for families, health care providers, and relief workers at:  www.ilca.org in English, Spanish, and French.   The website also has a user-friendly “Find a Lactation Consultant Directory” of available International Board Certified Lactation Consultants (IBCLCs) worldwide who can assist new mothers or relief workers with lactation.

To learn more about breastfeeding in emergency situations, visit the ILCA website at www.ilca.org, or contact the ILCA Office at info@ilca.org, or (919) 861-5577.

United States Lactation Consultant Association Announces

Date: February 3, 2010
Contact: Scott Sherwood
Tel. 919-861-4543
Email: ScottSherwood@uslcaonline.org
For immediate release

Breastfeeding Protects Mother And Child From Cardiovascular Disease

Morrisville, NC- The United States Lactation Consultant Association (USLCA) would to join the American Heart Association recognizing February as heart healthy month and February 5 as wear Red Day. Wear Red day is in recognition of support in the fight against heart disease. In honor of this day the USLCA would like to draw attention to women on the benefits of breastfeeding and the reduction of heart disease in the mother and baby. In a recent study, women who reported a lifetime history of breastfeeding for 12 months or more, were less likely to have postmenopausal cardiovascular disease. This study was conducted on 139,681 women who voluntarily participated in The Women’s Health Initiative at the University of Pittsburgh. The women ranged in age from 50 to 79 years of age. In this study prolonged lactation of at least 12 months has been shown to improve a woman’s glucose level, reduce metabolic disorder, obesity, hypertension and diabetes. This information is significant because the women who were studied had at least 30 years since they last breastfed and the protection was still prevalent. The importance of this information transcends all women regardless of age, parity, socioeconomic background, and education.

Heart disease is the leading cause of death of women in the United States. The American Heart Association reports that in the United States 1 in 4 women die of heart disease each year. The U.S Department of Health also reports that in 2004, 60% of all women who died did so because of heart disease and not cancer, which is what most people believe. Although these studies show the importance of breastfeeding for the health of women, The American Heart Association’s also states that there are heart health benefits for the babies as well.

The American Heart Association reports in their Scientific Sessions of 2007 that children who are breastfed “are less likely to have certain cardiovascular disease risk factors in adulthood then their formula fed counterparts”. It appears that children who are breastfed have lower BMI (Body Mass Index) and a higher amount of the “good cholesterol”. This good cholesterol helps protect breastfed children as adults from cardiovascular disease.

USLCA president, Laurie Beck, RN, MSN, IBCLC supports The American Heart Association and asks that on February 5th the United States Lactation Consultants wear red and educate women on the importance of breastfeeding and the reduction on heart disease in women and children. “This type of united support can help educate and support breastfeeding in hospitals and the community” says Beck.

Mission: To build and sustain a national association that advocates for lactation professionals

Vision: IBCLCs are valued recognized members of the health care team.

The United States Lactation Consultant Association (ULSCA), is organized exclusively for the advocacy of Lactation Professionals.

URGENT CALL FOR HUMAN MILK DONATIONS FOR HAITI INFANTS

Posted by NCTBA.org On January - 25 - 2010 ADD COMMENTS

The Human Milk Banking Association of North America (HMBANA), United States Breastfeeding Committee (USBC), International Lactation Consultant Association/United States Lactation Consultant Association (ILCA/USLCA), and La Leche League International (LLLI) are jointly issuing an urgent call for human milk donations for premature infants in Haiti, as well as sick and premature infants in the United States.

This week the first shipment of human milk from mothers in the United States will be shipped to the U.S. Navy Ship “Comfort” stationed outside Haiti. “Comfort” is currently set up with a neonatal intensive care unit and medical personnel to provide urgent care to victims of the earthquake. An International Board Certified Lactation Consultant stationed at the U.S. Navy base in Bethesda, MD is assisting with providing breast pump equipment and supplies to the “Comfort.” Dr. Erika Beard-Irvine, pediatric neonatologist, is on board the “Comfort” to coordinate distribution of the milk to infants in need. HMBANA, USBC, ILCA/USLCA, and LLL are responding to requests to provide milk for both premature infants and at-risk mothers who have recently delivered babies on board the U.S.N.S. Comfort, but an urgent need exists for additional donations.

At the current time, the infrastructure to deliver human milk on land to Haiti infants has not yet been established. As soon as that infrastructure is in place, additional donations will be provided to older infants.

Mothers who are willing to donate human milk should contact their regional Mothers’ Milk Bank of HMBANA. A list of regional milk banks is available at the HMBANA website at www.hmbana.org.

Currently milk banks are already low on donor milk. New milk donations will be used for both Haiti victims as well as to replenish donor supplies to continue to serve sick and premature infants in the U.S. Donor milk provides unique protection for fragile preterm infants. Financial donations are also strongly encouraged to allow HMBANA, a nonprofit organization, to continue serving infants in need.

UNICEF, the World Health Organization, the Emergency Nutrition Network, and medical professionals all recommend that breastfeeding and human milk be used for infants in disasters or emergencies. Human milk is life-saving due to its disease prevention properties. It is safe, clean, and does not depend on water which is often unavailable or contaminated in an emergency. Relief workers, health care providers, and other volunteers are urged to provide support for breastfeeding mothers to enable them to continue breastfeeding, and to assist pregnant and postpartum women in initiating and sustaining breastfeeding.

For more information, contact HMBANA at 408-998-4550 or http://www.hmbana.org/ . Additional information can be provided from the United States Breastfeeding Committee at 202-367-1132 (http://www.usbreastfeeding.org/), ILCA/USLCA at 1-800-452-2478 (http://www.ilca.org/  or http://www.uslca.org/ ), or La Leche League at 847-519-7730 (http://www.llli.org/) .

 Sincerely,

Angela's Signature

Angela Smith, President
ILCA Board of Directors

Milk Bank Locations
http://www.hmbana.org/index/locations

 

For those in the triangle area and surrounding areas
WakeMed Mothers Milk Bank
http://www.wakemed.org/body.cfm?id=135

Breast-Feeding for Over Six Months Aids Mental Health

Posted by NCTBA.org On January - 19 - 2010 ADD COMMENTS
"A good start can have effects years later"

"A good start can have effects years later"

Source- (Reuters Life!) January 19, 2010 —SYDNEY

Children who are breastfed for longer than six months could be at lower risk of mental health problems later in life, according to Australian research.

A study by the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research in Perth looked at 2,366 children born to women enrolled in a pregnancy study in the state of Western Australia.

Each of the children underwent a mental health assessment when they were aged 2, 5, 8, 10, and 14.

The researchers found that breast-feeding could help babies cope better with stress and may signal stronger mother-child bonding, which could provide lasting benefits.

“Breast-feeding for a longer duration appears to have significant benefits for the … mental health of the child into adolescence,” researcher Dr. Wendy Oddy, who led the study, wrote in the Journal of Pediatrics.

Of the children in the study, 11 percent were never breast-fed, 38 percent were breast-fed for less than six months, and just over half were breast-fed for six months or longer.

The mothers who breast-fed for less than six months were younger, less-educated, poorer, and more stressed, and were also more likely to be smokers than the mothers who breast-fed longer.

They were also more likely to suffer from postpartum depression and their babies more likely to have growth problems.

At each of the assessments, the researchers found children who were breast-fed for shorter periods of time had worse behavior, which could translate into aggression or depression.

But for each additional month a child was breast-fed, behavior improved.

The researchers said breast-feeding for six months or longer remained positively associated with the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents even after adjustments for social, economic, and psychological factors as well as early-life events.

“Interventions aimed at increasing breastfeeding duration could be of long-term benefit for child and adolescent mental health,” the researchers concluded.

  Most Recent 3 Articles
Strange Breastfeeding News
CALIFORNIA WIC SPEAKER IN CONGRESS
Adolescents' Perceptions of Inpatient Postpartum Nursing Care
-  Original Theme Modified and Site Maintained by InternetFD  -
18489
Designed by website templates